Pages

Thursday, November 1, 2007

MAGICALLY GAY

This one is an editorial article from today's Times Of India. Me likes! so me writes! :> drop in your comments please about what you think of the blogotorial :D


J K Rowling's recent announcement that Albus Dumbledore, one of the most beloved characters in the blockbuster Harry Potter series, was gay has created an uproar in the English-speaking world. While many have hailed the announcement, it has given a fillip to Christian Evangelists who decried the books as instruments of Satan. Others have criticised Dumbledore's outing as editorialising after the fact, and that if Rowling really wanted to make a point about homosexuality, she should've done so in the books. But Rowling has been diligent in portraying all manner of characters in her narrative, be it ethnicity, culture, race or physical appeal. Indeed, it would've been a remarkable omission if none of her characters were homosexual. In a world where gay rights are still a matter of intense debate, to have a character as well-loved and admired as Dumbledore be revealed as gay is indeed a Big Deal. The Harry Potter series has been a publishing phenomenon, with almost half a billion books sold to date. The movies have done extraordinarily well at the box office, earning $4.5 billion worldwide. As far as popular culture goes, it doesn't get more mainstream than Harry Potter.

The most important aspect of the outing is Dumbledore's character. Not only does his orientation help us understand him better, particularly with regard to his relationship with Grindelwald, but it also makes homosexuality a footnote, the way it should be. Characters don't go shouting their straightness from the rooftops, and the understated nature of this revelation does much to move away from enforcing what is called a ‘heteronormative' view, that being heterosexual is normal. Being gay didn't stop Dumbledore from becoming the most powerful wizard in the world, or from discharging his responsibilities as headmaster of a premier school or heading various associations. He is, in the Potterverse, a force for the light, a symbol of hope and a champion of the underdog. Harry Potter's sheer visibility means that most Dumbledore fans will become aware of his orientation. Many parents have taken up cudgels at the thought of the conversation they will have to have with their children. But because Dumbledore is without doubt a heroic figure, the mentor to the chosen one, being gay will have to be OK.

9 comments:

My Foot? said...

"Characters don't go shouting their straightness from the rooftops"

very true!

I wanna see parents sit and explain this to their kids though :D

Miss. Mystic said...

well our society is such not only indian but eveywhere else...if one is gay he is treated like as if he is an aline..they snicker and make fun ... "straight" men avoid shaking hands wid em...i now of a frined who was gay and he was in all-boys skool wid me n imagine wat he wouldve gone thru if he made his gayness public...i dont get it r some ppl so narrowminded that a simple thing as having feelings for another man is wrong.. "Alaudin Khili" a mighty warroir and the builder of siri fort was a homosexual who had a gay lover malik kafur... n at dat time no one had any qualms...look at the concept of nymphs in greek mythology...kamasutra has gay positions to iread it in a bbc uk article... we are just homophobic

random thoughts! said...

thanks for the precious comments, i haven't read your blogs yet..but will surely do..lol that must have been an accident..

but cheers any ways! :)

Sam said...

Gosh!! much ado abt nothing.. dats what I wud say... I mean it's ok if a fellow is gay... you got your preferences they got theirs.. seriously people can be so biased especially on such matters!! I remember coming across one such fellow who was riding his scooty just because soem guys were hell bent on making fun of him (red: physically!!)... told him a shortcut to make his way out of that place faster... And that fella is a team lead with a prominent BPO in Pune!! So, what was so different about him?? Just that he likes guys.. right!!
Oh by the way I woudl like to add teh same guys who have qualms in mixing arnd with gays wudn't think twice if they ahd to do so with a lesbian!! same goes for girls... the other way round please.. :D
such hypocrisy!!

Miss. Mystic said...

ppl r homophobs ..they emselves dnt knw dere preferences...i wana say thru dis dat even i went thru dis as a kid in an all boyz skool i felt gay myself..n only now i feel that i was confused n not gay...sm1 i knw n even u guyz knw helped me...wat i felt after dis is dat we need sex ed. n greater empathy...i was sexually abused as a kid n dats wat triggered itt off...n now i am on a path of gettin over it...i hope u guyz understand how hard it is for me to say dis n also try to absolve myself..i felt homophobe for quite a while coz of my own feelings...n now i have gr8r respect not only 4 gays but women 2..i feel women understand such issues much better then men...i dnt knw y??

Florence R. said...

hav we all gone off topic????

true..homosexuality shold be approved the way studs of our society are but as Mani made good mention...how to explain this to kids???
this started as initially a kids book not young adult books. It was an Enid Blyton with magic recreated. Not many young 'uns can comprehend this!!!

n such things about gay characters is for the reader to decide....thts how forums on books start. each has right to their own opinion.

Florence R. said...

oh yea...an important thing...

when Enid Blyton was questioned about the golliwogs being black in her books her reply was specifically that, "..if that's ur perception then your not my target audience!!"

Rowling started the books for kids then suddenly her target audience changed...increased rather.


p.s: i have nothing against the books. i read em with immense pleasure :)

Miss. Mystic said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anon said...

i guess at the end of the its all about our own personal choices. why should the sexual orientation or for that matter any difference dictate our opinion of the other person? and i don't think there could be anything more hypocritical than changing your opinion about someone just because you found out a tardy irrelevant but nevertheless socially unacceptable detail about them!